Pirate Y'arrrrd
My backyard is not your typical backyard. Sure, we have a pool, gazebos and the like.... but we also have a pirate ship, a pirate store and a pirate tattoo parlor. This year, our pirate ship got a roof added to the cabin.... last years sails were spruced up with some skull and crossbones. Red and white bunting was added for a festive flair, along with red and white fishing nets.The "Lick and Stick Tattoo Parlor" is having its grand opening on June the 9th. Peer beyond the pirate ship under the burlap awning... Here it is....It is in the early stages of construction, here is the table where all the tattoos will be given.....On the counter there is a small fairy garden... where Tink and her friends are playing with some little snail friends... be sure to check it out when you come to the grand opening!Of course, "Chloe's Unique Pirate Boutique" has been open for a few weeks now. Little Miss Chloe has been busy bagging and unbagging merchandise as she sees fit. Nothing is for sale, thats what makes this boutique unique.This is just the beginning of pirate season, there are large pirate steamer trunks full of silver and treasures to be unpacked and placed here and there... and there.... and there......... arrgggghhhh!... a work in progress to be sure!
A Man Of The People
Back in 2008, I wrote a couple of blog posts about how impressed I was by then Presidential candidate Barack Obama.
He seemed like a breath of fresh air, an opportunity to create hope and deliver change, representing the true desires of his country because he was a Man of the People.
Not being American, I couldn’t vote for him. And not being American, I also haven’t been as invested in what he has or hasn’t been able to accomplish during his first term in office.
As a political junkie I knew he would never be as good or bad as his supporters and detractors made him out to be. He was just a guy doing what he felt was best for the people he was elected to serve.
But I don’t fully believe that anymore. And if I was an American, I wouldn’t cast a ballot in his favor this time around.
That has nothing to do with specific foreign or domestic policies, health care plans, gay rights, drones, Guantanamo Bay or whether or not the guy running against him is better suited to the job.
It’s based on a chapter of his autobiography and something that happened to a friend of mine 40 years ago.
Back in the 1970’s, Toronto was home to a lot of Viet Nam war draft dodgers. One weekend, some my actor pals and I, looking for a touch football game in High Park, met up with a half dozen of them looking for the same thing.
From then on we met every Sunday afternoon to play some football, shoot the shit and try to scrounge up a few beers in a town that was still mostly dry on the Sabbath.
One Sunday, they had a new guy with them named Justin. Justin was from Texas and had done a tour in Viet Nam and been honorably discharged. One of the Dodgers was his best friend and he’d come to visit because his buddy couldn’t cross the border anymore.
Justin was a great guy. Smart, funny, good-looking, the spitting image of the All American boy.
He also liked to get high.
My time ‘experimenting’ had ended long before I met Justin. But what he did was his business and I didn’t judge.
He was one of the first people to read the script that became my first produced screenplay, laughed in all the right places and told me how much he looked forward to seeing it on screen.
Justin went back home, and a year later the script got shot.
Around the same time, I learned he’d been busted with a couple of joints in his pocket. Since he lived in Texas that earned him a ten year prison term.
I wrote to offer support and let him know we’d made the film. He wrote back saying how much he wished he could see it –- but it might be a while.
He sounded broken and without hope. I felt I should do something to help.
I got the production company to lend me a 16mm print of my film and begged the Warden where Justin was doing his time to screen it for the men in his charge.
He wasn’t warm to the idea and it took a lot of cajoling, promises that nothing in the film would cause him a problem and a cheque to cover return shipping before he agreed.
I sent off the film and it came back a couple of weeks later with a curt note of thanks on State of Texas stationery. A few days later, Justin called –- collect.
He told me the film had screened twice to a packed auditorium, likely seen by more people on one hot, Texas Saturday night than its entire first week in Canada. Everybody had had a great time.
He was happy for me. Excited. I asked how he was doing and he trailed off, not offering much before quickly ending the call.
After that, he only wrote once or twice and a couple of years later let me know he’d been paroled for good behavior and was trying to restart his life. But with a criminal record it was hard.
A lot of doors had been closed to him.
That letter included a photo and he looked almost withered. Incarceration had taken its toll.
I never heard from him again.
Around the same time, there was another Texas resident who liked getting high. His name was George W. Bush. But because of wealth or privilege or maybe just dumb luck, he never got busted nor went to prison or had his life broken.
In fact, he got to be President of the United States.
I’ll let others judge whether or not he was a good President. But he never appealed to me because he didn’t seem like a man of the people. He may have led them, but he always felt above or apart, disconnected from those he was elected to serve.
Not far away in time and place, the man who would succeed him as President also liked to get high.
In his 1995 autobiography “Memories of My Father”, Barack Obama detailed his own drug use. He recounted spending a lot of his time in high school smoking weed and doing cocaine when he could afford it.
Twenty years after I’d last heard from Justin, I did a couple of police ride-a-longs in Texas and saw kids the same age he and I would have been in the 70’s still being busted for barely smoke-able amounts of marijuana, many facing those same draconian sentences.
I also spent a few weeks on the South side of Chicago, embedded with a narcotics unit, probably on the very same streets where Barack Obama was then working as a community organizer.
It was pretty clear to anyone paying attention that America’s “War on Drugs” wasn’t succeeding and that far more people were being damaged by the workings of the Justice system than by the drugs that system was trying to eliminate.
Depending on where you stood it had the appearance of a Race War, a War on the Poor, or a method of punishing those who wouldn’t or couldn’t become productive members of the society.
The drug dealers still prospered. Their profits fuelled gangs and a myriad of criminal activities.
And those drug users blessed with wealth or privilege or dumb luck didn’t suffer the punishments doled out to everybody else doing exactly the same thing.
They didn’t have their lives broken.
I don’t know what Barack Obama’s time getting high taught him. I don’t know if it convinced him drugs were an evil that needed to be stamped out, or that nobody should have their lives broken over smoking a little reefer.
But I do know that he goes on talk shows and plays up the latter while enforcing laws based on the former.
And that tells me that he embraces what wealth and privilege and dumb luck can get you over doing the right thing –- whatever he believes that right thing to be.
For me that makes him less a visionary than a politician. Someone who feels he’s above and apart. And that tells me he is not a man of the people.
Sailing
Pool Report: The Props Contest Begins
A couple of teams nobody thought would go far in the playoffs this year have made it to the finals. And some of the experts who insisted neither had a chance are now claiming they might be bringing the best Cup series we’ve seen in a while.
Each team features high-scoring forwards, tough defenses and spectacular goalies. Two unstoppable forces meeting equally immovable objects.
Expect some fireworks.
And for those still bemoaning the lack of CanCon in the Finals. Remember these two things…
1. Most of the LA Kings are Canadian.
2. Nickleback is the official Music provider of this year’s NHL Final Series.
As an added note: As of May 25, 2012, more people own a Nickleback album than any album released by The Rolling Stones, Queen, Kiss, Jay-Z, Foo Fighters, The Band, Beyonce, The Black Keys, Kanye West, Oasis, TLC, Janet Jackson, Beck, Katy Perry, Adele, Kanye West, Blink-182, Dave Matthews Band, Ludacris, Dr. Dre, Radiohead, R.E.M., Bob Seger, Blackstreet, The Strokes, Soundgarden, or -- Brandy.
Any minute now, Thomas Mulcair will issue a press release claiming Nickleback’s success is preventing Eastern Canada from discovering the next Justin Bieber.
As for successful players in the Infamous Writers Hockey Pool – as we go into the Finals, John McFetridge leads Maurey Loeffler, Mike Vardy and Will Dixon.
The rest of us are pretty much out of the running.
Which means this little life-saver is coming along at just the right time…
THE PROPS CONTEST
For those of you unfamiliar with the concept, a little history.
Betting on sports has been around as long as there have been guys who needed to pump up their self-esteem by proving they were right about something.
And for centuries money changed hands based on who won or lost a contest.
Then Las Vegas and the Super Bowl were invented. Pretty soon the smart guys who ran the Casinos realized that while you could make millions on who won a football game, you could make Billions with side wagers.
So Proposition Betting was created to give us sports degenerates an opportunity to blow our money on outcomes nobody in their right mind can confidently predict.
You might be wagering on the coin toss (Janet Gretzky's favorite -- seen here at Caesar's Palace with absolutely non-betting husband and Hockey Great One Wayne) or if a touchdown is made by a player whose jersey number is over 30.
Props are also not one bet options. You need to pick at least a half dozen. The odds of collecting on your bet are infinitesimal. But then, you can't put a price on a good time, can you?
So here's how the "Infamous Writers Pool Hockey Props" works…
There are six bets. All are related to the Stanley Cup Finals.
Some require sports knowledge. Some only require guts! The player with the most correct answers wins. And a special piece of Canadian Hockey memorabilia (currently treasured by Yours Truly) will be awarded to the winner.
Should there be a tie -- uh -- we'll figure that out if there's a tie.
But this contest will definitely not be decided until well after the final game!
Entry is open to all current pool players, everybody who’s been kicking themselves for not getting in on the original action and anybody else who just needs to boost their self image.
Entries must be sent to seraphic77@gmail.com anytime between now and the 8:00 pm Eastern faceoff for Game One on Wednesday May 30 in New Jersey.
Your six Hockey Propositions are:
1. The 2011-2012 Stanley Cup winner will be decided in:
a) Four Games
b) Five Games
c) Six Games
d) Seven Games
2. The total number of goals scored in the Final series will be:
a) Less than 20
b) 20 to 30
c) More than 30
3. New Jersey Goalie Martin Brodeur enters the final round with a .923 Save Percentage. LA’s Jonathan Quick's average is .946. At the end of the final series, the Highest Goalie Save Percentage will belong to:
a) Brodeur
b) Quick
c) Neither
4. "Hockey Night in Canada" icon Don Cherry always confidently predicts the winner of each game prior to the opening faceoff. For the FOURTH game of the series, he will be:
a) Correct
b) Incorrect
For non-Canadian players -- CBC's "Hockey Night in Canada" is streaming all games at http://www.cbc.ca/sports, usually in more languages than English.
5. The Leading Scorer in the final series will be:
a) Ilya Kovalchuk (NJ)
b) Zach Parise (NJ)
c) Dustin Brown (LA)
d) Anze Kopitar (LA)
e) Other
6. The Captain of the winning team is the first player to hoist the Stanley Cup and skate a victory lap. The Cup is then passed to each member of his team. And it's usually passed to someone the player holding the Cup feels is especially deserving. The Goalie of the winning team will be:
a) One of the first six players to hoist the Cup
b) The Seventh to Twelfth player to hoist the Cup
c) One of the remaining players to hoist the Cup
Tough enough? C'mon, suck it up! How often do you get a chance like this?
For the record, the Pool Standings as of today:
Lazy Sunday # 222: Piff The Magic Dragon
Talent is a good thing.
Talent plus attitude…
…now that’s magical.
Enjoy Your Sunday.
Guest Post: Readability Has Giant Balls
Mike Vardy is the Managing Editor at Lifehack. An independent writer, speaker, podcaster and "productivityist", you can read more of his writing at Vardy.me. He is @mikevardy on Twitter.
But right now you can read a guest post by Mike right here. It concerns something every writer posting on the internet needs to be aware of – “Scraping”.
Yep, I haven’t gone down this road in some time, slipping away from productivity and such and talking pure tech.
And yep, the headline might be a bit misleading (but not entirely), especially when you consider my thoughts on Readability and its latest co-venture, Readlists. What they aren’t doing is scraping, per se.
But they might as well be.
I remember attending 604 FreelanceCamp in 2010 and watching (at the time soon-to-be my friend) Kemp Edmonds deliver a talk on how to protect your content. He shared a story about how his own content was essentially stolen, and one of the audience members asked him about scraping. He talked a bit about scraping sites, and you can really dig into his thoughts over at his weblog.
Here’s what a scraping site is, courtesy of Wikipedia:
“A scraper site is a spam website that copies all of its content from other websites using web scraping.”
I can tell you that I’ve had to deal with scraping sites for some of the major websites I’ve worked for, and Lifehack content gets scraped a lot. A whole lot. I’ve even got a TextExpander snippet that I use to send to these sites to let them know they’ve repurposed and republished content without permission (and are making money off of said content in most cases via GoogleAds, etc.). I can count on exactly zero fingers the amount of times I’ve received a reply or had one complied.
I hate wasting time on these sites. After all, I’d rather be a dog breeder than a dog catcher. (Note: I am not saying that all content I create/edit are “dogs”. Far from it.)
Now, let’s all talk about Readability and Readlists, and how what they do differs from what scraping sites do…and how what they do doesn’t.
Differences
1. They are reader-driven services. Readability and Readlists are reader-driven. In order to for profit to be had, the reader needs to take action with a specific post (or create a list). The service simply aggregates and compiles for them. So unlike scraping sites, the work isn’t entirely done by the site itself, but by the person using the site.
2. Marketing/Promotion. Scraping sites generally don’t market or promote themselves. The content does that for them via search engines. Readability and Readlists definitely do promote themselves. When Readlists launched this past week, I was able to find out about it on a lot of technology sites on the Internet. Even Lifehacker had a piece on it – and you know how much I love reading their stuff. Several of my online writing friends (Ben Brooks, Stephen Hackett) wrote about it, and others who I respect – but don’t know personally – (Kyle Baxter) did as well.
The old-style scraping sites never promote themselves. Does that mean that they have more brains than guts? Probably. Because I’d have to say that Readability and Readlists seem to displaying more guts than brains with how they seem to work the system.
3. Writers can get paid. Unlike a pure scraping site, Readability does pay those who register once they hit a certain benchmark (much like how Google Adsense pays publishers). But you only get paid twice per year – which is, to be fair, two times more per year than old-school scraping sites pay.
Similarities
1. Profiting from the works of others. Sure, publishers can get paid (I haven’t), and here’s how Readability themselves describes the way that happens:
“As a web publisher or writer, you can register with Readability and start collecting contributions. Any time a Readability Subscriber uses Readability on a page of yours, a portion of that Subscriber’s monthly contribution is allocated to you. Here’s an example: Joe Subscriber pays $10.00 a month for the Readability service. Of the $10.00, $7.00 (70%) is allocated for publishers. If Joe reads 14 articles with Readability on 14 different domains in the month of February, each domain will receive $.50 ($7.00 divided by 14 pages) from Joe’s contribution pool.”
So Readability (although it doesn’t explicitly state this) takes in 30% of the monthly subscriber fee. But if a domain hasn’t registered with a site then the division changes up. Well…what if none of the sites are registered? What then? Does Readability keep 100%? Sure, it might not be likely that no site any one subscriber visits in a month isn’t a registered site, but it is possible. Ben Brooks has talked about Readability’s money collection practices before, and he did so when he was advocating the service.
(In fact, you can check out Ben’s thoughts on Readability from the get-go by just searching his site with the term “Readability”. You’ll get every last one of ’em.)
2. Not asking permission first. Ben covered this as well, and the fact that money is being made off of my content without asking first (all of my content on Vardy.me and Eventualism is licensed Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Unported) is a problem for me. Yes, I did register my site when the service launched. And I didn’t opt out right away once all of this stuff starting coming to light. But when they announced Readlists….well, that was it.
I’ve asked Readability to stop processing and storing my content. Same goes with Readlists.
Which brings to what I can say is another difference: at least they got back to me and seem to have complied. Can’t say the same for the other scraping sites out there.
So there’s that.
Photo credit: Greg Peverill-Conti (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Pool Report: Week Seven Ends
Just when you thought CBC Television couldn’t be anymore out of touch, they’ve launched something for “The Ladies” during the Stanley Cup Playoffs.
Beginning with next Wednesday’s first game of the Finals, CBC will offer an alternative audio feed dedicated to "sports commentary that women actually want to hear."
Described by giddy CBC publicists as “Sex and the City meets Hockey Night” the alternate game commentary promises “things that have absolutely nothing to do with the game”.
Because as we all know, girls are too stupid to understand or enjoy sports. And what’s more, us guys have no interest in sharing the game experience with them and would prefer they just shut up and keep the cold beer and nachos coming.
Women who write and report on Sports in Canada were among the first to react, calling CBC’s decision “patronizing”, “disheartening” and something that sets both them and female fans back decades.
Shannon Proudfoot of Sportsnet (part of the company CBC now has to negotiate with for the rights to Toronto Maple Leaf games) was asked to fathom how CBC came to the decision. She responded, “They all had to be falling-down, wet-their-pants drunk. Only explanation. I’m about to have a rage stroke.”
But for a lot of us who work in the business, that aptly describes the manner in which CBC is run these days. Decisions made at the kind of sleepovers where girls paint their toenails and gush about boyfriends –- or in CBC’s case, their boyfriend’s development deals.
God knows CBC would never denigrate their coverage of women's hockey or the upcoming Women's FIFA championship with an alternate feed of what a bunch of uninterested guys have to say.
And they certainly wouldn't want comedy writers providing a funnier version of their sitcoms, nor the industry insider feeds that accompany the Genie and Gemini awards online, revealing what we really think of them.
Most of all, they certainly aren’t listening to their fans:
No, if this was really about getting more people to follow or enjoy hockey, those alternate audio streams would be used to reach viewers who only speak Mandarin, or the hockey-mad Punjabi and Russian Diasporas who struggle to find play-by-play coverage in their native tongues.
But building audiences and providing what they want are clearly not how CBC believes taxpayer funding should be spent.
Another reason more and more Canadians (including me) will be watching the remainder of the playoffs on NBC.
As we approach the final games of Round Three, the standings of the Infamous Writers Hockey Pool are as follows:
Lawyers in Cages
I know --- a good start…
Still –- this is one of the best ad campaigns I’ve seen in a while.
Lucky number 5
Pool Report: Week Seven Begins
Didja feel it?
Both Sunday and Monday. Once in the East and once in the West.
That little intake of breath that let you know these Stanley Cup Playoffs just got their second wind and decided to make things more interesting.
In the West, Phoenix, and especially their aging stars, decided not to go gently into the desert night. Maybe they finally realized how few actually get this close to Stanley. Or perhaps, they at last figured out the goalie who’s stoned them three games straight.
Did you catch Ray Whitney’s interview after the game? There he was with a towel around his neck and the monkey missing from his back; looking not like a man still one game away from elimination, but one who had finally figured out the secret.
On the opposite coast, New york and New Jersey dropped all pretence and made it clear they hate each other’s guts. This one’s already guaranteed to go six and probably will take seven. And there’s no doubt it’ll only get rougher.
Poolie and Jersey fan Mike Vardy has already offered to trade his Facebook stock for tickets on Stubhub.
Meanwhile, John McFetridge has the overall pool lead by a nose. But depending on how these series end, there are a couple of folks further down the list who could be moving up fast.
Second winds work like that.
Robin Gibb
I can’t tell you how much I hated the Disco Era. The polyester. The spandex. The endless, by the numbers, repetitive, lyrically inane songs.
But all the girls I wanted to go out with loved to dance. So somewhere there are pictures of me in a white suit with wide lapels and belled cuffs – and shoes made by “Master John” of Yonge Street.
With this weekend’s sad passings of Robin Gibb of the Bee Gees and Donna Summer a lot of the music from that time is getting airplay today.
But I want those who missed Disco to know that Robin Gibb and his band mate brothers Maurice and Barry were churning out hits long before Studio 54 was a glint on Steven Rubell’s coke mirror.
And they were still singing magnificently written songs long after the last place with a mirror ball had become a Punk venue.
Yes, in-between, there was “Saturday Night Fever” and the other fluff their promoter Robert Stigwood foisted on the world.
Which makes most people think of spandex and polyester when you mention “The Bee Gees” and forget that they were among the finest songwriters and live bands of the 20th century.
Looking and listening back, it’s hard to imagine what it must have been like to be in an Australian bar on the Queensland coast when these guys first opened their mouths and out came that distinctive vibrato-falsetto sound.
I first heard a Bee Gees song in 1967 on a transistor radio. And I watched their last hit debut 30 years later on an Air France in-flight video.
Both were examples of how to write something unforgettable. And I present them both here from a live concert so you can get some idea of just what a great band these guys were and how much we have lost now that Robin has followed brother Maurice onto the stage where that “Helluva Band” reportedly plays.
Forget Disco. These guys were as talented as they come.